U.S. taking action in Syria conflict (?)

[OutlawƎ]

Your opinions on this if it happened ?

[ladelsofgravy]

The U.S. should totally stay out of Syria. There are many acceptable circumstances where it's okay to intervene, and this is not one of them.

Both the Syrian government and the rebels have committed atrocities. Neither side is ideal and neither side is worth supporting.

If I were forced to choose between the two, I'd side with the Syrian government. The Syrian government has kept the conflict within Syria and has not caused trouble with other countries. We do not have that same guarentee if the rebels take control of the government.

Assad is quite moderate on religion, but the rebels in their roots very well could be affiliated with groups like Al Qaeda, and this is often what happens in revolutions. The moderate people lose strength and morale and are replaced by extreme groups who are able to get the funding.

[Trax]

How do you think Russia and China will respond?

[ladelsofgravy]

How do you think Russia and China will respond?

Russia and China care about money and their national wellbeing first and foremost. They could give a shit about spreading ideology, so I think we're safe to a degree because they know a conflict with the U.S. is more undesirable for them than it is for us.

That said, Russia and China will do what they can to prevent the U.S. from becoming a hegemony.

And truth be told, I think Russia has the better end of this argument when it comes to Syria.

[Hansen]

I think theres a World War 3 in the horizon

[ladelsofgravy]

lol there's no world war 3 looming lol

[ladelsofgravy]

It just takes 1 attack tbh

uh no, you dont really understand history lol

[classthe_king]

America intervenes and we're the bad guy for trying to interfere in middle eastern conflicts

America doesn't intervene and we're the bad guy for letting atrocities happen

same ol shit

Korea are scary as well.

You've got to be fucking kidding me

We could gather up TR's consistent members and march into korea and take it

[B.A.D.]

The thing is that USA should not really intervene in any way on the Syrian conflicts, they are up to them to resolve them. USA wants to attack syria for other reasons like economical and advantage reasons, as someone mentioned Russia has Military advantage with their bases on syria, so the war would turn into China, Russia, Iran, Syria & North Korea against United States, England, Israel and probably Germany. A war that if it starts it will not have any winners. The first one to cross the line and even turn on the nuke system as a mere warning will mean devastation, World Wide devastation. Its very simple really, if USA turns the boats back and let Syria handle their own (although purposely fabricated) problems, then there would not be a reason for Russia to even think about attacking USA and Iran attacking Israel. Its all a strategy game, unfortunately millions of real lives are at risk here. And it indeed is scary, for American People, European People and Asian people. There is nothing for the US to win in there, if they intervene then its going to turn ugly for everyone, regardless the size of any army. Obama has to find other methods of increasing the dollar count in Petrol sales rather than war.

[ladelsofgravy]

No doubt WW3 would destroy the U.S. economy and put in a 2nd Great Depression.

But the U.S. would totally ANNIHILATE any COUNTRY in a CONVENTIONAL war in a matter of a few months.

[iHeart]

Of course they are


Let's not forget who fuels the war, let's also not forget the UK who sold nerve gas chemicals to Syria.

Heaven forbid something in the world happens and they actually mind their own business.