by SajN » Jan 30th, '12, 19:06
In theory, ACTA’s purpose is to fight copyright infringement. It’s supposed to support artists, journalists and so on by a harmonization of enforcing protection of copyrights. For many artists and people who get paid for being creative and do not want to be robbed, this seems like a fair deal. What’s wrong with ACTA then?
According to many copyright law experts, instead of dealing with piracy ACTA will significantly limit basic civil rights and freedoms.
ACTA’s articles are too general and ambiguous. The definition of “pirated copyrighted goods” is too vague and too broad, while the means of copyright protection — too radical. The articles interfere with our basic rights, such as: free movement of information and expressing opinion, freedom of art and science or right to education. ACTA is a threat to our basic rights, especially those regarding personal data and privacy protection.
According to ACTA, a suspicion of infringement is enough to demand “information regarding any person involved in any aspect of the infringement or alleged infringement”. In effect, any audio, video, image or text file sent by email or linked to can set in motion what is described in ACTA as “prompt and effective provisional measures” regarding anyone who, knowingly or unknowingly, gained access to the file. A simple link that you might click by accident, or a file that you will receive by email may mean that your Internet provider has to disclose your name, address, IP number and other personal data. At the same time, to “prevent an infringement of any intellectual property right from occuring” and to “preserve relevant evidence in regard to the alleged infringement” it will be absolutely legal to cut off your Internet access, as well as take away your computer, hard drives, disks or pendrives in order to examine them by police experts.
How does ACTA work
Let’s say you paid for a photography course and shared information acquired during that course with your friends. You think that what you did was in accordance with fair use. But no, the copyright in each and every country is slightly different. What’s legal in your country can be forbidden in the country where the course was created. ACTA eliminates these differences. According to ACTA –the execution has to be fast and cheap. The author contacts your country’s police and courts about your copyright infringement and they will apply countermeasures – an allegation is enough. You’ll be treated like a criminal and after that you get to explain yourself.
You probably wonder: how would they know you shared information with your friends and no one else? We wrote that ACTA introduces a law that orders anyone to provide “information regarding any person involved in any aspect of the … alleged infringement”.
Your Internet Service Providers (ISP) or site administrators will not risk their whole business to protect your account. Even more, not to risk being charged as an accomplice (see: megaupload.com case), the administrator or ISP might start to monitor everything on their sites. Control the content and report all of the questionable cases. Privacy in the Internet may stop existing.
Anyone who cares about an Internet free from censorship, should know as much as they can about ACTA. Let the world know, that what’s about to happen is bad for every Internet user.
! Is He Nuts? No, He's InSajN !