9/11 Conspiracies

[M15HKA]

9/11 was very convenient for the U.S governments foreign policy.
I'm sure they knew what the terrorists planned etc many things don't add up but I'm sure the terrorists did it and the government purposely turned a blind eye towards it.

[M15HKA]

No, FORGET the politics of it. You look up the Science.

Those buildings 100%, absolutely, could not of, by the laws of physics fell the way they did WITHOUT being controlled demolition.

Every national structural-engineering body in the world, has accepted the technical findings of the 9/11 commission and FEMA and NIST reports. I am sure some sort of anti U.S nation would have found evidence to back your conspiracy. Also if someone did find that in a country outside the U.S they would have told the world straight away. It's not like just the U.S structural engineering body analyzed it but every one in the world!

[mrjizzbomber]

No, FORGET the politics of it. You look up the Science.

Those buildings 100%, absolutely, could not of, by the laws of physics fell the way they did WITHOUT being controlled demolition.

Every national structural-engineering body in the world, has accepted the technical findings of the 9/11 commission and FEMA and NIST reports. I am sure some sort of anti U.S nation would have found evidence to back your conspiracy. Also if someone did find that in a country outside the U.S they would have told the world straight away. It's not like just the U.S structural engineering body analyzed it but every one in the world!

I think I commented earlier in this thread. The buildings were actually designed to collapse that way. All skyscrapers are.

And slamming and exploding a jet into a steel building results in a more complex mode of failure than most people will understand. I have no doubt that the planes resulted in the buildings falling. People throw around the word 'science' without knowing what they're talking about. They just hope they don't actually run into a scientist.

Oops.

[Emadyville]

^^ I have done my research, do not talk like I'm an idiot, and just "throwing the word science around". Do your own research or continue to embarass yourself; knowledge is power, ignorance is bliss

[mrjizzbomber]

^^ I have done my research, do not talk like I'm an idiot, and just "throwing the word science around". Do your own research or continue to embarass yourself; knowledge is power, ignorance is bliss

You still haven't told me what 'science' you're referring to. The major scientific dispute I've heard about 9/11 is that the towers couldn't have collapsed form the planes, because jet fuel can't melt steel. And anyone using that piece of 'scientific evidence' clearly has no grasp of science.

Yes, I have also done my research. In a lab...

[mrjizzbomber]

BTW, I wasn't trying to pick a fight with you. Its just that, when dealing with conspiracies, a lot of people will throw out false information. It sounds convincing, and it helps spread the conspiracy theory. I have no doubt you've read up about all of this, but... you need to be real careful with your sources. Particularly on the internet. Something can seem very legitimate, but just be a ton of bullshit.

I've personally never seen any convincing 'scientific evidence' supporting the conspiracy theorists' take on 9/11. I welcome you to show me anything you got, and I'd be happy to dispute it.

And I'm deeply involved with science, so I usually use myself as my source

[Emadyville]

Go on youtube, there are many videos, one has an MIT professor for 45 minutes talking about the collapse and how they had to be man made, as in demolition. Many scientists from Europe have concluded the same thing. IF you haven't found any, then you just aren't looking.

[AbramIsaac]

MJB:

You mention the melting steel not being the factor that caused the collapse.

That's fine and all, but the reason that's mentioned is because there was molten steel at Ground Zero. That, and the traces of demolition material that is military-grade.

Just pointing that out.

[Emadyville]

MJB:

You mention the melting steel not being the factor that caused the collapse.

That's fine and all, but the reason that's mentioned is because there was molten steel at Ground Zero. That, and the traces of demolition material that is military-grade.

Just pointing that out.

Exactly, there was molten steel still below ground zero 2 weeks afterwards, this was proven by eye-witness accounts and thermal readins from space

[mrjizzbomber]

MJB:

You mention the melting steel not being the factor that caused the collapse.

That's fine and all, but the reason that's mentioned is because there was molten steel at Ground Zero. That, and the traces of demolition material that is military-grade.

Just pointing that out.

Exactly, there was molten steel still below ground zero 2 weeks afterwards, this was proven by eye-witness accounts and thermal readins from space

I take eyewitness accounts 100% for granted, but give me a source about the thermal reads. If you have sources I'm more than excited to read into them, I love shit like this.

I knew a kid who used to go on and on with different conspiracy theories, and he has references for everything he said. It makes it a lot more credible... although, eventually I end up disagreeing with him anyway

[Emadyville]

[mrjizzbomber]

Uh . ? .

[gutawafang]

[Emadyville]

:o

I know

[mrjizzbomber]

Uh . ? .