WhatsAnEnigma wrote:mcZu wrote:That's stupid, and do you know why? Because that's like you're saying muslims did it. They didn't. And a lot of muslims died on that day too. Meaning there are more than enough muslims who lost someone in that attack. Sensitivity? Why don't we start protesting against churches being built in America? I'm sure someone who's living near those churches lost a loved one because he got killed by a christian. Any random mugger or murderer could be a christian, but you don't see those people blame christianity. The religion didn't attack those people, the people that are following that religion didn't attack those people. The people who did attack those people were terrorists.
Then who committed the attacks?
There's a difference between a Christian killing someone and a Radical Muslim killing out of religious ideals, which you mentioned but also forgot that they are radicals of Islam. You're argument is invalid. The Radicals claim the lesser Jihad and take it to extremes as a means of offensive warfare.
I'm done trying to argue with you as I could care less to change your opinion, you can believe whatever you want, I'm just stating my opinion, which in this case is true. They claim the lesser Jihad, if you don't believe that then go look it up or watch the special where Bin Laden says "We love death. The U.S. loves life. That is the big difference between us."
I believe that Muhammad doesn't want his own followers killing themselves, but they are radicals, and I understand the difference between the two but they're still a sector inside of Islam.
You're done trying to argue with me? We haven't even started.... There have been a lot of serial killers who killed out of religious Christian ideas. So, no, you're argument is invalid. It is not a sector inside of Islam, it has nothing to do with Islam. It is a idealogy on its own, claiming to be part of a religion. And I could care less what Bin Laden says, especially since he had/has close ties with the Bush family.
And even if what you said was true, let's assume it is, it still doesn't justify the argument of building a mosque near ground zero being unsensitive. Because a mosque has nothing to do with radical people blowing themselves up.