by EminemBase » May 18th, '11, 01:10
Well... first of all, there is something you could define as 'human nature' but it's simply a collective way of thinking and acting, and reacting, defined by our species.
There have been many studies showing that irrespective of country, culture or class, we all share universal qualities that are unshakable and no matter how strange certain rules of society or X can look on the outset, everything usually boils down to a common ground we all share. One thing that is distinctly human is language.
Language...
It's been convincingly proven that language is an innate compulsion in humans rather than an acquired trait or an after-thought of evolution. It's in us from the start and... that's why a baby can be born anywhere and learn any language. Babies are built to learn language.
This is evident even from watching a baby. When you see a baby in a room full of adults speaking for example and you see the baby saying random words, trying to piece things together. Now, what's interesting is... babies are not just literally hearing words, remembering them and then repeating them. If they did that, they wouldn't be able to form new sentences...
Every sentence ever uttered is a new sentence and this is what shows there is an innate structure to language. There's deep, universal, genetic predispositions and underlying tram-lines to language that you can't ignore and... a baby is essentially a little language machine exercising these rules and trying to creatively express itself with new combinations of words.
Greed...
As for greed: greed is clearly not an innate human quality in my opinion. If it were then we wouldn't of gotten this far as, we're simply not fast enough, not strong enough, not scary or vicious enough to survive in the wild on our own. If we were greedy and self-serving we wouldn't of come this far.
Humans, by nature, are altruistic. It's in fact altruistic behaviour that is at the very root of human behaviour and could probably be attributed for the majority of our success as a species. The fact we can feel empathy for other human beings by putting ourselves in their shoes / by seeing ourselves as them is what is crucial to us extending each other our hands.
We've succeeded as a species with group behaviour. Social smarts. Big brains. Empathy.
Greed is a result of a monetary system. Think about it, if you take away money or strip commodities of their value, how could you possibly feel greed? how could greed as a concept even exist in your mind. If everything was abundant, free and everlasting, how could you possibly have the concept of greed. It couldn't make logical sense.
You could of course want lots of lots of something, but everybody would have access to 'lots and lots' all the time, unquestioned. Therefore we couldn't have a singular self-serving existence in the same way.
The monetary system is the bane of our existence. By putting a perceived value on food and produce, we create class and struggle and we divide each other. And think even of how we put a monetary value on human life. Take for example the fact that... we spend more money making sure a military airline is safe than we do a civilian airline...
Now, both airlines are to be used by humans but one of them (the military) is for government serving humans that are more crucial to the overall survival of 'the system' and current state of affairs. So because of that we play roulette. People simply don't step back and realize how much we do this.
We also build things to lesser standards. Not necessarily on purpose but to maximize profit. We're actually, in all probability living in a world of technology that precedes our current state by, maybe fifty years. We're constantly living in the past, because of the monetary system. It strains our progress in every sense. It divides, stifles us and pollutes us, in many ways.
So no. Greed is not innate or human nature. We've just tricked ourselves into thinking that overtime because we've forgotten what it's like to not live like it. People simply can't imagine a world without money or price tags, they seem to think it's natural. It's not natural, it's a construction. And any outside construction will have unseen and variable effects on our behaviour.
Humans are basically good, well-intentioned and altruistic. It's societal structure, money and power which corrupts our innate behaviour and creates the bloodbaths and greed fests we see around us.
Morality...
As for the source of our moral sense or 'inner guidance', it's what most would call a 'soul', except there's nothing magical or mystical about it. This feeling which we call a soul still exists but, it's simply mechanical and a product of evolution. In our brains.
We have an innate sense of right and wrong from group conditioning. Overtime we probably learned what was beneficial or not in group behaviour and for the species as a whole. We learned that by being generous to somebody, we would likely receive the same behaviour back. This has an exponential effect and thus grows our sense of beneficial behaviour.
So, it's that kind of conditioning that I mean that probably shaped our moral reasoning not to mention a simple golden rule we all know of 'do to others as you'd do to you'. Religion likes to think it was the originator of this rule when in fact it's philosophical and is clearly an innate human sense.
It all boils down to logic. Logically speaking, if you want other human beings to be nice to you, you would assume that you would have to be nice to them. That assumption is probably not an assumption but more so a proven fact overtime as, it's easier. And what's easier and beneficial, wins.
I know you said not to bring evolution and religious debates into it. Which I didn't. I kept it very minimal. But if you're going to ask about human nature it's simply a very big ask to expect absolutely no mention of either since, they're both crucial conversation points in respects to morality.
So yes, there are many things about us that make us human and separate us from the animal kingdom. Though, I say that loosely as we are still technically animals and basically 'brilliant Apes'. But, the biggest thing of course that makes us human... ?
Consciousness...
The ability to be aware of ourselves is without a doubt the biggest thing that makes us human. The ability to empathize with each other and comprehend our own existence.
Now, in all actuality - even though it's assumed, we don't truly know which animals are conscious or not. We simply assume we're pretty much the only one since we can deviate from our instinct, and analyze it where as most animals cannot. But whichever ones can and to whatever degree clearly cannot do so to the degree humans can, we're way way out in front.
Elephants for example though can: empathize not only with other elephants but with other species. Which is pretty amazing indeed. There have been examples of elephants helping humans and there's also a classic mirror test to determine if an animal is aware of itself...
Basically, a mark is put on the animal that is visible only in a mirror. When the animal sees the mark in the mirror, depending on whether they touch it on themselves or the mirror indicates (probably) if they are aware of themselves or not. Cats and dogs, touch the mirror - as they assume they are seeing another dog, and seeing the mark on that dog.
Elephants however, touch the mark on themselves. Showing they are aware, of themselves.
It does appear that a huge brain creates the rise of consciousness but again, we don't really know how conscious other animals are. And we can't measure it. There may be degrees of it as... Dolphins for example have sex for pleasure and also play for fun. So this kind of indulgent behaviour indicates they are in fact aware of and able to deviate from their instincts somewhat.
I do also think that consciousness tricks us all into thinking we have more control over everything than we actually do though. I could for example right now kick a window through if I wanted to, randomly... or I could throw shit at my bedroom wall or take all my clothes off or any number of actions. But, I won't. And why won't I... because there's enough instinctual rebel against that kind of thing which sees no sense in it... yet I COULD right? but... I won't.
I think people also assume they have much more control over their outlook and personality than they do. So much evidence points to so much of your build-up being innate and genetic. Your chance brain structure is responsible for how you see the world and chance meetings can determine so much also. I think that in many instances 'free will' is in fact an illusion and... just a luxury. It's like a free gift given to us by evolution for being so smart, it's like an added bonus.
But, let's say you for example go into the fridge to get a drink and you see Coke or Milk. Let's say you deliberate between the two a little while and eventually go for Coke. Now that may feel like a free choice but how free really was it? maybe your mind was already made up, maybe you were always going to choose milk because it contains certain qualities and vitamins that your body was thirsting at that time and even though the Coke was there as a speculative choice... you were never going to pick it.
That kind of thinking is, academic and largely unsolvable, at least right now. But, it's food for thought if nothing else.