jinofthewind wrote:And Koolo's sources said... Nothing you idiots Koolo's sources are dead they're locked in my basement
nxt-semster-illB35 wrote:Stan 10/10
Bad Guy first 3 quarters 6.5/10
Bad Guy epilogue 9.8/10
idk that all seemed kind of contrived, it's not like that was his intention when he wrote stanStayWideAwake wrote:The entire twist of Matthew also ending up being symbolic for everything in his life and career that's closing in on him and coming back to kill him is fucking incredible
agreeand acknowledges and says things in a way he really hasn't done before. That second level it operates on
mehpushes it past just the concept of a "sequel to a story".
trentimus wrote:You can rate a song based on:
wordplay & lyricism [Stan]
content [Stan]
originality (of content)[Stan]
flow (has an effect on wordplay)[Stan]
beat [Bad Guy]
innovation (different than originality, its more focused on the details and such) [Stan]
Stan is a defining moment in hip hop and also stands the test of time as one of the greatest story telling tracks of all time. This was also one of the first times we got a peak at the human reality that is Marshall Mathers.
Bar none.
kpprasa wrote:trentimus wrote:You can rate a song based on:
wordplay & lyricism [Stan]
content [Stan]
originality (of content)[Stan]
flow (has an effect on wordplay)[Stan]
beat [Bad Guy]
innovation (different than originality, its more focused on the details and such) [Stan]
Stan is a defining moment in hip hop and also stands the test of time as one of the greatest story telling tracks of all time. This was also one of the first times we got a peak at the human reality that is Marshall Mathers.
Bar none.
Dawggg.... WTF. The rest are opinions but really? Stan doesn't have better wordplay than Bad Guy. It just doesn't.
mononym wrote:mononym approves Trilla
Users browsing this forum: No registered users