if homosexuality cannot naturally reproduce, how can it

[Trimss]

Homosexual people can reproduce.

Yeah they can but they have to use human made technology/another woman, which means they're not able to reproduce by themselves. That's what they're saying.

[UofLCard]

Homosexual people can reproduce.

Yeah they can but they have to use human made technology/another woman, which means they're not able to reproduce by themselves. That's what they're saying.

Yeah, I knew what you meant technically.

[Minimii]

dident read lol so i dont know if this bin said but homosexuality is obviously useful otherwise it would not exist.
How tis useful then? well gay people dont get children which makes them better uncels and aunts giving their nephews and nephgirls better change of survival and thusly passing on their genes via their siblings
there

[EG.]

dident read lol so i dont know if this bin said but homosexuality is obviously useful otherwise it would not exist.
How tis useful then? well gay people dont get children which makes them better uncels and aunts giving their nephews and nephgirls better change of survival and thusly passing on their genes via their siblings
there

looooooooooool

[Minimii]

looooooooooool

tis a theory which was logiced with science
and it makes lot of sense

[Fleka]

Don`t have the time to go through the thread and read the replies, so maybe someone already said this: my theory is that homosexuality is a tool nature uses to control the population of the world. And it comes in handy for the orphans, because gay couples must adopt.

[Minimii]

thats insanely stupid theory
the population hasnt been a problem until like 100 years ago and secondly im pretty sure that orphans didnt need to be adopted back in the days when we were living primitive since the whole community would probably take care of them.
That or they just died off. Besides even if they would of been adopted by gay couples i fail to see how that would pass on the gay gene of that couple. It wouldnt be their biological child

[Fleka]

thats insanely stupid theory
the population hasnt been a problem until like 100 years ago and secondly im pretty sure that orphans didnt need to be adopted back in the days when we were living primitive since the whole community would probably take care of them.
That or they just died off. Besides even if they would of been adopted by gay couples i fail to see how that would pass on the gay gene of that couple. It wouldnt be their biological child

Ahhahahahaha on the first huge part.

And where did I mention the second huge part?

I was kidding, man. My country had a referendum on gay marriage a year ago, so gays, their marriage and adoption by gays was very popular topic back then. I used that theory to piss off people that were really...conservative and hated on gays.
But, what you said is really stupid.

[Guess_Who]

Minimii has to be a troll,

viewtopic.php?f=28&t=173081&start=75#p2757673

I see no other explanation.

[SliK]

Minimii has to be a troll,

viewtopic.php?f=28&t=173081&start=75#p2757673

I see no other explanation.

Definitely.
He used to be a lot better, too.

[Minimii]

Ahhahahahaha on the first huge part.

And where did I mention the second huge part?

I was kidding, man. My country had a referendum on gay marriage a year ago, so gays, their marriage and adoption by gays was very popular topic back then. I used that theory to piss off people that were really...conservative and hated on gays.
But, what you said is really stupid.

ok first off tis impossible to tell if people are being serious when it comes to evolution since most people know nothing of it besides "if we came from monkeys how is there still monkeys".
and yea you were "kidding".
lol
and what i said wasnt stupid if we assume that you were being serious.

[Fleka]

Ofcourse it was stupid.